Representation Of Females In Pride And Prejudice & Bride And Prejudice

Authors

  • Rehmana Kausar UMSIT Kotli
  • Tayyaba Bashir
  • Arshad Mehmood Women University of AJ&K, Bagh
  • Arshad Mehmood Women University of AJ&K, Bagh
  • Kiran Rukhsana

Abstract

This paper examines the application of ‘us’ and ‘them’ by considering it a postcolonial representation of binary opposition in the two films: Joe Wright’s Pride and Prejudice and Gurinder Chadha’s Bride and Prejudice. It explores the notion of Postcolonial theory that has partitioned the female class of both selected movies into divergent sections. Generally, though not particularly, these two films present the notion of ‘us’ and ‘them’ but in a developed form that has been referred to as the lower and the higher classes and are more valuable in their role of constructing the Postcolonial atmosphere. However, keeping in mind the nature of research, qualitative content analysis is chosen as a research method with the close reading of Joe Wright’s Pride and Prejudice and Gurinder Chadha’s Bride and Prejudice including and by applying Said’s notion of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ as a theoretical framework. With such an application, visual and auditory elements including content, the Indian tradition of hospitality and pecking order appear as the binary attributes of ‘us’ and ‘them’. The paper is concluded by showing the attributes of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ which are assigned to the female class in both selected movies.

References

References

Brontë, Charlotte (1992). Jane Eyre. New York: Wordsworth Classics. Print.

Dervin, F. (2012). Cultural identity, representation and othering. The Routledge handbook of language and intercultural communication, 2, 181-194.

Downe‐Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health care for women international, 13(3), 313-321.

Dutt, R. (2014). Behind the curtain: women’s representations in contemporary Hollywood. London: LSE.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE open, 4(1), 2158244014522633-109.

Glen, H. (Ed.). (2002). The Cambridge companion to the Brontës. Cambridge University Press.

Geraghty, C. (2006). Jane Austen Meets Gurinder Chadha: Hybridity and Intertextuality in Bride and Prejudice. South Asian Popular Culture, 4(2), 163-168.

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.

Jovchelovitch, S. (1996). In defence of representations. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 26(2), 121-135.

Kara, M. (2017). Said’s Orientalism: European Scholarship as a Way of Realizing and Justifying Oriental Projects. İdil Sanat ve Dil Dergisi, 6(39), 3021-3033.

McKee, K. (2009). Post-Foucauldian governmentality: What does it offer critical social policy analysis?. Critical social policy, 29(3), 465-486.

Mushtaq, H. (2010). Othering, stereotyping and hybridity in fiction: A Post-colonial analysis of Conrad’s Heart of Darkness (1899) and Coetzee’s Waiting for the Barbarians (1980). Journal of Language and Literature, 3.

Perea, J. F. (1998). The Black/White binary paradigm of race: The normal science of American racial thought. La Raza LJ, 10, 127.

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.212.

Ponzanesi, S., & Waller, M. (Eds.). (2012). Postcolonial cinema studies. Routledge.

Ponzanesi, Sandra, and Waller, M. (2013). Postcolonial cinema studies. Journal of Language and Literature. 272-74. Print.

Rojas, C. (2012). From Classic Novel to Popular Culture: The transformation of Pride and Prejudice into film and television.

Said, E. W. (1982). Opponents, audiences, constituencies, and community. Critical Inquiry, 9(1), 1-26.

Said, E. W. (1989). Representing the colonized: Anthropology's interlocutors. Critical inquiry, 15(2), 205-225.

Said, Edward W.Orientalism: England: Penguin, 2003. 40. Print.

Schreier, Margrit (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications. Print.

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? Marxism and the interpretation of culture. C. Nelson and L. Grossberg. Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 271-313.

SR, M., Niazi, N., & Ghaforian, A. (2011). Edward Said’s orientalism and the study of the self and the other in Orwell’s Burmese Days. Studies in Literature and Language, 2(1), 103-113.

Stemn, E., Hassall, M. E., & Bofinger, C. (2020). Planning and implementing remedial measures from incident investigations: a study of the Ghanaian mining industry. Safety science, 127, 104735.

Turner, G. (2006). Film as social practice. Routledge.

Wenzelová, B. P., & Jelínková, M. E. (2010). Postcolonial rewriting of master texts by Charlotte Brontë and Katherine Mansfield.

Wright, J. (2001). Bride and Prejudice (2004) directed by Gurinder Chadha and Bridget Jones’s Diary.

Wright, J. (2005). Pride and Prejudice. Keira Knightley.

Zehra, T., Shaheen, Z. U., & Batool, H. B. H. (2017). A Comparative Analysis of News Structure for Two War Commentaries: Analysis of News Structure for Two War Commentaries. Erevna Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 1(2), 07-21.

Published

2021-02-27

How to Cite

Rehmana Kausar, Tayyaba Bashir, Arshad Mehmood, Arshad Mehmood, & Kiran Rukhsana. (2021). Representation Of Females In Pride And Prejudice & Bride And Prejudice. Erevna Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 4(2), 1-12. Retrieved from http://journals.au.edu.pk/ojserevna/index.php/erevna/article/view/179

Most read articles by the same author(s)